As a freelance photographer I have the great luxury of accepting whatever jobs I want. Reasons why I might not want the job are numerous. Maybe the budget isn’t big enough. Maybe I’m already booked. Maybe I don’t want to travel that far. Maybe I don’t have a babysitter. Or maybe I have a personal reason.
But usually the truth that I tell my inquirer is, “Unfortunately, I am unable to shoot on that day. Here is a list of other photographers that I recommend. “
This isn’t the case for everyone. Some photographers will tell you exactly why they will not be shooting for you. Receiving a lot of publicity now are the vendors who are not “Gay and Lesbian Friendly.”
Recently, NPR did a story highlighting Vanessa Willock v. Elaine Photography. When Elaine received an email inquiry about shooting a wedding she replied, “We do not photograph same-sex weddings. But thanks for checking out our site! Have a great day!”
Now, I think this is a rather tacky response. But I don’t think it should have cost her $6000. The lesbian couple won the court case on the grounds of discrimination.
Personally, I am Pro Happy. I don’t care who you fall in love with. I care that you love. I care that you’re happy and I am honored when anyone enjoys my talent enough to have me present at any ceremony as eternally important as a wedding ceremony.
But it seems that as we ask for tolerance from the world for our different beliefs, perhaps we should also try practicing it ourselves.
Suing a photographer because they don’t want to shoot your wedding is pompous and trying to pose an answer without a question. I think photographers should be allowed to take whatever jobs they want, regardless of the reason. I think people should be able to marry whoever they fall in love with, regardless of their gender.
And I wait on time to bring ease and clarity and peace for those who are uneasy. You should know though, Gay is not going to go away.

www.photopolus.etsy.com



5 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 14, 2010 at 10:14 am
Lyn Caudle
Wow this is just absurd!
What happened to we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.
I am with you though. “Pro Happy”.
But don’t sue me because I don’t want to shoot your wedding. How about respect my right to disagree with you choice of sexual inclination?
The photographer could have chosen a better response.
January 14, 2010 at 11:06 am
Ange
discrimination is discrimination whether based on someone’s sexual preference or the color of their skin. it’s wrong. and it’s illegal.
January 15, 2010 at 2:41 pm
Tyler
That is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. Though the photographer could have packaged her response in an even nicer manner than she did already, I don’t think it is fair to be sued for making such a statement. I don’t shoot weddings because most of the time they are BORING. Does that mean I am discriminating against individuals getting married? Absolutely not. I would also choose not to photograph inter-species erotica, because I find it a bit un-natural and disturbing. Does that mean I should get sued by people that have animal partners? This woman deserves her money back, as her choice is in now way offensive, and the clients could have just as easily found a different photographer.
Thanks for sharing the story Carissa.
January 15, 2010 at 10:34 pm
carissabyersphotography
I agree. Our opinions shouldn’t cost us money in this instance.
Inter-species erotica, eh? Now there’s a niche market. And Tyler, didn’t we first meet shooting a wedding together?!
I keep saying I’m going to get out of the wedding business. And then I take one and have SO much fun!
January 17, 2010 at 3:37 pm
Tyler
Yep, we definitely did meet at a wedding shoot, with Hal. I believe that might have been the last one I did, that was quite some time ago. They can be fun I am sure, I guess I always just got unlucky with reserved and quiet people. I guess I prefer a little more danger
Hope you are well Carissa, nice reading your posts.